Atlanta Falcons

Fifty-seven sacks. The Atlanta Falcons finished second in the entire league in sacks this season — ninety-seventh percentile, a top-three pass rush in football. Here's how that pass rush carried a defense playing quietly winning football, how Bijan Robinson turned into one of the most efficient backs in the NFL, and the one number on third down that explains why the season ended at eight and nine instead of in January. Eight wins, nine losses, third among NFC non-playoff teams. The Falcons muffed the postseason — again — but the bones of this thing are more interesting than the record suggests.

Let's frame the team by the numbers. Atlanta's offense finished with minus twenty-two point one expected points added on the season — how much every offensive snap added or subtracted from their scoring chances — ranking twenty-fourth, twenty-eighth percentile. The defense came in at minus three point nine expected points added allowed — and remember, on defense, a negative number is a good thing — good enough for fifteenth, slightly above average. The killer stat is third down. Atlanta converted just seventy of two hundred and five, thirty-four point two percent, thirtieth in the league, ninth percentile. Bottom-three football on the most important down. And the season had real variance — blown out by thirty in Carolina in Week 3, lost by twenty-eight to Seattle in Week 14, then closed on a four-game winning streak. Boom-or-bust, with the boom showing up too late.

Now let's talk about the passing offense. Two-quarterback season, and neither version pushed the pace. Atlanta averaged two hundred and seventeen point eight passing yards per game on team passing expected points added of minus six point six across five hundred and seventy-four attempts — thirty-eighth percentile, below average but not catastrophic. The bigger problem was protection and accuracy: twenty-six sacks allowed at a four point four percent rate, twenty-eighth in the league, and both quarterbacks finished below expected completion percentage — Michael Penix Junior at minus three point two, Kirk Cousins at minus one point nine. The unit verdict: Kyle Pitts smashed his role as the security blanket — eighty-eight catches, nine hundred and twenty-eight yards, five touchdowns, the team's leading receiver by a wide margin. The signature play was Cousins to Pitts on third and seven from the seven, fourth quarter, Week 15 in Tampa — a red-zone touchdown that punctuated a one-point road win. That's the passing offense in a sentence: not enough big plays, but Pitts kept drives alive.

Now let's dig into the rushing offense. Here's where it gets weird. Atlanta ran for four point five yards per carry — eighth in the league, seventy-eighth percentile — and one hundred twenty-five point nine yards per game. By the per-carry number, this was a top-ten rushing attack. But the rushing expected points added was minus nineteen point two, twenty-second in the league. How do those numbers coexist? Volume and situation. The Falcons ran a lot, often in spots where running was the wrong call by game state. Bijan Robinson was the engine — two hundred and eighty-seven carries, fourteen hundred and seventy-eight yards, five point two a carry, seven rushing touchdowns, plus seventy-nine catches for eight hundred and twenty more yards. His rush yards over expected: plus two hundred and fifty-seven point one on the season, plus zero point nine per attempt, seventh among qualified runners. Robinson smashed — boom-or-bust by design, with the booms big enough to carry it. The signature: Week 17, second quarter, first and ten on his own seven, Robinson hits the right tackle gap and runs ninety-three yards to the house against the Rams. One cut, one explosion, six points.

Next up, the pass defense. This is the unit that should keep the lights on in Atlanta. Fifty-seven sacks, second in the league, ninety-seventh percentile. Passing expected points added allowed of minus sixteen point eight seven — again, big negative on defense is a real positive — sixty-third percentile. They got home consistently and they generated negative plays. Twenty-one takeaways at one point two per game, seventy-eighth percentile. Steady floor, high ceiling. The play that captured the unit's identity came in Week 18 against New Orleans, fourth quarter, Saints driving to tie or take the lead, third and seven from the Atlanta twenty — Tyrice Shough drops back, throws short left, and DeMarcco Alford jumps the route at the fourteen and returns it fifty-nine yards. Game over, division win secured. Pressure, pick, finish.

And the run defense. This is the soft spot. Atlanta allowed one hundred and twenty-six point eight rushing yards per game, with rushing expected points added allowed of plus twelve point nine five — on defense, a positive number is bad — twenty-fifth percentile, bottom of the league. Twelve rushing touchdowns surrendered. The Week 3 shutout in Carolina and the Week 8 thirty-four point hammering at home to Miami were both games where the run defense got moved off the ball. A top-three pass rush should not be paired with a bottom-eight run defense — and that's the cleanest reason the Falcons finished one game under five hundred instead of one game over.

Atlanta didn't pick in the first round. Their headliner is a corner with a 4.66 Relative Athletic Score and zero college interceptions. Six picks, no first-rounder, four on defense — a front seven reset with one swing for offensive juice. Here's what the data says about the receiver at 79, the linebacker bet that defines this class, and whether a defense-heavy haul fixes what 2025 broke.

Start with the loudest pick on paper. Atlanta's 2025 passing offense finished at minus 7.52 in total expected points added with just 19 passing touchdowns over 17 games — they needed a separator. At pick 79, they got Zachariah Branch out of Georgia: 81 catches for 811 yards and 6 touchdowns, with that reception total leading the SEC and ranking 13th nationally. His per-play predicted points added — the college equivalent of NFL expected points added — was plus 0.50, totaling plus 49.62 on the season. That's elite separation against the best competition in college football. Then layer in a 9.04 Relative Athletic Score for receivers — a 0-to-10 grade comparing combine and pro-day testing to every player at the position since 1987. Top 10 percent of every receiver ever measured.

The second-round pick went into a secondary that didn't actually need rescuing. Atlanta's 2025 pass defense graded out fine — minus 16.87 in expected points added allowed with 57 sacks — but they still surrendered 27 passing touchdowns. Enter Avieon Terrell, the Clemson corner at 48: 48 tackles, 4.5 tackles for loss, 3 sacks, and 8 pass breakups, fifth in the ACC. The zero interceptions is the asterisk you can't hide. Neither is the 4.66 Relative Athletic Score, which lands below the position median. The tape has to carry this one, because the testing isn't.

The real volume came up front, and the reason is brutal: Atlanta's 2025 run defense allowed plus 12.95 in rushing expected points added. Opponents won expected points on the ground every week. First answer — Kendal Daniels at 134, a 23-year-old linebacker out of Oklahoma. A former safety who played stacked, at the apex, sometimes deep at the line in the Venable scheme. Cunningham emphasized length and fluidity. The stat line: 54 tackles, 10 tackles for loss, 3 pass breakups. The 5.09 Relative Athletic Score is middling — the bet is positional flex, not testing.

The day-three swings are where it gets fun. Pick 208: Anterio Thompson, Washington defensive tackle, with a 9.38 Relative Athletic Score — top 7 percent of interior linemen ever tested. Modest production at 29 tackles and 2 tackles for loss, but Cunningham called him powerful and explosive with hand strength and instincts. Then at 215, Harold Perkins Jr. out of LSU: 55 tackles, 8 tackles for loss, 4 sacks, and an 8.63 Relative Athletic Score — top 14 percent. Stefanski cited the versatility, on and off the ball, plus special teams. Cunningham added that Atlanta's scouts had tracked Perkins since his freshman tape jumped off the screen. The bet: recover the player he was before he became the player he is now.

One offensive lineman closes the board. Round seven, pick 231, Ethan Onianwa — Ohio State by way of Rice. A 7.83 Relative Athletic Score puts him in the top quarter of tested tackles. Cunningham described him as big, powerful, good feet and balance, with reps at tackle and guard after the transfer. Swing versatility at 231 is the appeal.

Pick of the draft: Perkins at 215. You can argue Branch — cleanest producer, top-10-percent athletic profile, immediate-snap path. You can argue Terrell because that's where the capital sits. Perkins wins on cost-to-upside. A sixth-round flier on a former freshman phenom is the kind of swing that defines classes when it hits. Scouts had been on him since that freshman tape; Stefanski singled out the versatility. If even 70 percent of that early-career player shows up in Atlanta, this is the steal of the entire haul. If not, you spent pick 215 on a lottery ticket. Either way, the ratio is the best on the board.

The 2026 question: is four defensive picks and zero capital on the offensive line or running game enough to flip a roster that finished 2025 at minus 14.62 in rushing expected points added? The front seven got a real injection — Daniels' flex, Thompson's measurables, Perkins' upside, all behind a coaching staff Cunningham repeatedly praised as developers. But Branch is the only skill swing on a passing offense that posted minus 7.52 in expected points added, and the line got one developmental tackle in round seven. The defense should look different. Whether the offense holds up while the front seven gets coached up is the stress test that decides this class.