Subscribe free — every Broncos episode in your podcast app
New episode every week of the 2026 season2025 · AFC West champion, #1 seed
Denver Broncos 2026 Season Preview — the Regression Math Everyone Is Doing Wrong
Play fantasy? There's a version about your whole roster — build your show, free →
Show notes & transcript▾
This is the Denver Broncos 2026 season preview, and here's the strangest thing about it: the Broncos went 14-and-3, played in the AFC Championship game, brought back nearly everyone — and the consensus win number for 2026 sits at nine and a half. The market is calling last season a fluke. Here's what's funny. The regression math the skeptics are leaning on? We ran it, on ten years of data. It doesn't land at nine and a half. It lands at eleven. Both sides of this argument are getting Denver wrong, and the numbers that settle it are not the ones anybody's talking about.
Start with what was real, because plenty was. Denver's defense finished sixth in the league in expected points allowed per play. The pass rush wasn't just good — it was historic-adjacent: 68 sacks, the most in football. And here's the number that tells you the whole story of this roster: the offense gave up just 23 sacks all year, a 3.4 percent sack rate — the least-sacked offense in the NFL. Put those together and Denver's sack differential was plus 45. The next-best team in football was Atlanta at plus 31. That 14-sack gap between first and second is the kind of margin you almost never see in a league built for parity. Denver won the line of scrimmage on both sides, every week, all season. That's real, and that kind of thing tends to stay real.
The offense was quieter but solid — tenth in expected points added per play, ninth passing. Courtland Sutton did Courtland Sutton things: 74 catches, 1,017 yards, seven touchdowns. The ground game was the soft spot — 14th in rushing efficiency, with J.K. Dobbins leading the way at 772 yards in ten games before the rookie R.J. Harvey took over down the stretch and finished with seven rushing scores plus 47 catches. A top-ten offense carried by protection and a top-six defense carried by pressure. Fourteen wins' worth of underlying play? Not quite. And that's the second half of the story.
Now, what was luck. Denver went 11-and-2 in one-score games. Let me put that number in context, because it's the single most important stat of their season. In the last ten years, only three teams won eleven one-score games in a season: the 2022 Vikings, the 2024 Chiefs, and these Broncos. The Vikings went 7-and-10 the next year. The Chiefs went 6-and-11 — last season, in this same division. That's the club Denver just joined. And across a decade of data, teams that won at least 65 percent of their one-score games lost about three wins the following season — and only about one in nine improved at all. Denver's point differential says this was an eleven-win team that went 14-and-3. Here's the part the regression crowd gets wrong, though: the luck was concentrated entirely in the close-game margins. It was not a turnover-fueled season — Denver's turnover margin was actually minus 2, eighteenth in the league, and the defense was just 23rd in takeaways. Sixty-eight sacks, twenty-third in takeaways — they got home all year; they just didn't get the ball. Why does that distinction matter? Because turnover luck and close-game luck are the two big giveback categories, and Denver only has to give one of them back. Strip the coin flips and you're left with a team whose floor is the point differential — about eleven wins. Eleven is not nine and a half. The market over-corrected.
Let's talk about the identity, because this is the most schematically interesting team in football — charting data via nflverse. Denver played man coverage on 44.6 percent of dropbacks last season. Most in the NFL, and it wasn't close to a gimmick — they ran Cover-1, single-high man, on 31 percent of snaps, third-most in the league, and played two-high shells at the third-lowest rate in football. The league default is the two-high shell — roughly four in ten dropbacks league-wide came against one last season. Denver went the other way: press man, one safety deep, and win your rep. You can only play that way if you get pressure without sending extra bodies — and that's exactly what they did: second in the NFL in pressure rate at 34.5 percent, with a blitz rate that was merely sixth. Around the league last season, blitzing didn't actually buy results — defenses that sent five gave up more per dropback than defenses that rushed four. Denver is the team that proves the alternative: win with four, sometimes five, cover with the rest, let Pat Surtain erase a man. Nik Bonitto's 14 sacks led the team. And the man who calls all of it, Vance Joseph, was named the league's top assistant coach — and stayed, because all ten head-coaching vacancies filled without him. Same coordinator, same corner, same identity. When we say a defensive fingerprint carries into 2026, this is the cleanest case in the league.
So what changed? Almost nothing — and one enormous thing. Denver re-signed seventeen of its own free agents. Sean Payton got a new deal through 2030. The real losses: John Franklin-Myers and his seven and a half sacks took Tennessee's money, and Dre Greenlaw was released. The big swing came in March: Denver sent its first-round pick, a third, and a fourth to Miami for Jaylen Waddle — and took back his full contract. Waddle's 2025 was quiet — 64 catches, 910 yards on 100 targets — but the bet is on the player, not the stat line: speed a Payton offense can scheme open. The cost of the trade showed up in April: Denver's first draft pick didn't come until 66, a defensive tackle from Texas A&M named Tyler Onyedim. And then the enormous thing, the one buried under the transaction lists: Sean Payton fired his offensive coordinator, promoted 31-year-old Davis Webb, and — for the first time in his Denver tenure — handed over play-calling. The offense that protected Bo Nix better than any team in football protected any quarterback now gets called by someone who has never called a play in an NFL game.
Which brings us to the 2026 question, and it's not the one on sports radio. Bo Nix's raw numbers say average quarterback: 21st in adjusted net yards per attempt, and a completion percentage over expected of minus 2.1 — twenty-eighth among qualified starters. He completed fewer passes than the average quarterback would have thrown to those spots. But the splits tell a more specific story. Nix was sixth in the league against man coverage, at plus 0.196 expected points per dropback. He was ninth against the blitz. Send pressure or lock him up man-to-man and he beat you — those are the scheme answers, the things Payton's system drills. Play soft zone and make him work methodically, and he was eleventh, ordinary. And he did all of it with a top-five-lowest pressure rate in football — pressured on barely a quarter of his dropbacks. So here's the honest frame: Denver won fourteen games with a quarterback who performed like the twenty-first-best passer in football, because the system around him — the protection, the play-calling, the defense — was arguably the best in the league at covering exactly his weaknesses. That's not an insult. That's a formula, and it worked all the way to the conference championship. But every piece of that formula is what's being tested in 2026: new play-caller, an ankle that got surgically repaired twice since January — broken in the divisional round, cleaned up in the spring, on track for camp — and an edge room where Jonathon Cooper, eight sacks last year, faces open domestic-violence charges with a hearing set for late July. Those are the real variables. Not the coin flips.
Fantasy names to know — scored half-P-P-R, as always. Sutton is the safe one: 74-1,017-and-7 with a hundred-plus targets two years running, wherever the market prices him. Waddle is the fascinating one: a hundred targets of pedigree walking into a top-ten pass offense that just spent a first-round pick's worth of capital on him — the situation bet of the Denver roster. The backfield is the headache: Dobbins re-signed, Harvey ascending — 47 catches as a rookie is the tell that Payton trusts him — but two backs plus a fourth-round rookie from Washington means nobody gets a clean workload. And Nix himself: 25 touchdown passes and a system that manufactures red-zone throws — he was seventh in red-zone efficiency — plays better for fantasy than his accuracy numbers read.
The verdict. The market says nine and a half wins, third-best team in their own division. The regression math — the real math, run on a decade of one-score teams — says this roster's honest baseline is about eleven wins, and what made it special — the line of scrimmage and the coverage identity — comes back nearly intact. Denver gives back the coin flips and stays dangerous — unless the ankle or the rookie play-caller takes back more. That's not a fluke profile. That's a contender with a luck tax due. The Broncos won't go 14-and-3 again — and they don't need to.
Follow the Denver Broncos feed for the weekly show — every game, every number, all season. This was the Muffed 2026 Broncos preview. Every number verified.
More episodes
Season ReviewMay 11, 2026Broncos 2025 Season in Review
14-3 regular season
▾
Broncos 2025 Season in Review
14-3 regular season
Show notes & transcript
Sixty-eight sacks. The Denver Broncos defense got home sixty-eight times in 2025 — number one in football, the hundredth percentile of the entire league. Here's how Vance Joseph's pass rush rewrote this team's identity, what Bo Nix actually was when the lights got brightest, and the one weakness that finally caught up with Denver in January. Fourteen and three. AFC West champs, the number-one seed in the conference, a Divisional Round win over the Bills — and then a seven to ten heartbreaker at home to the Patriots in the AFC Championship. The 2025 Broncos smashed. They just didn't quite finish.
Let's set the table with the team numbers. Offensively, Denver finished at plus fifty-three point six in total expected points added — how much every snap added to their scoring chances across the season — tenth in the league, seventy-second percentile. The defense was even better: minus ninety-two point seven in expected points allowed, and remember on defense that big negative number is elite — sixth in football, eighty-fourth percentile. The schedule tells you this was a steady, grinding team, not a boom-or-bust one. Eleven of their fourteen wins came by eight points or fewer — the thirty-three-thirty-two thriller against the Giants in Week 7, the thirteen-eleven dogfight at the Jets in Week 6, the twenty-two-nineteen win over the Chiefs in Week 11. The third-down rate backs it up: forty-two point seven percent, eleventh in the league. This team stayed on the field, stayed close, and won the margins.
Now let's talk about the passing offense. Denver threw for two hundred thirty-one yards a game and finished at plus fifty-four total passing expected points added — plus point zero eight per attempt, ninth in football, seventy-fifth percentile. Solid, not spectacular. Underneath the headline, Bo Nix's ball-placement numbers were below the league bar — completion percentage of sixty-three point four against an expected sixty-five point five, a completion percentage over expectation of minus two point one, twenty-eighth among qualified starters. So how did the unit finish top ten? Volume, explosives, and one elite outside receiver. Courtland Sutton — seventy-four catches, one thousand seventeen yards, seven touchdowns — was the engine. Watch the Week 3 game at the Chargers: down ten-nothing late in the second quarter, fourth and two from midfield, Nix to Sutton on a deep ball down the left sideline, fifty-two yards, touchdown. That single play added more than six expected points and it tells you exactly what this passing game was — not surgical, but big-shot capable when Sutton ran underneath it. One real concern: Denver was sacked twenty-three times on six hundred seventy-six dropbacks, a three point four percent sack rate, thirty-second of thirty-two — the third percentile. The pass protection was the worst-ranked unit in football by sack rate. They survived it. That's not a guarantee.
Now let's dig into the rushing offense. Split-personality story. The team total: two thousand eighteen rushing yards, one hundred eighteen point seven a game, four point four yards a carry, sixteenth in football. Total rushing expected points added came in at minus nine point three, fourteenth in the league, fifty-ninth percentile — functional, not dominant. But the arc matters. Through Week 10, J.K. Dobbins was the back — one hundred fifty-three carries, seven hundred seventy-two yards, five point one a clip, and a rushing yards over expected of plus one hundred sixty-one, fourth among qualified runners in the entire league. That's elite. Dobbins didn't appear after Week 10 — likely injured reserve — and the workload shifted to rookie R.J. Harvey, who finished at one hundred forty-six carries for five hundred forty yards, three point seven a carry, with a rushing yards over expected of minus ninety point eight. Same offensive line, very different output. The efficiency dropped when Dobbins went down, and you can feel it in the second-half numbers.
Next up, the pass defense. This is the headline of the entire season. Denver allowed two hundred twelve yards a game through the air and posted a passing expected points added allowed of minus seventy-five point seven six — ninety-fourth percentile in the league. The engine was the rush. Sixty-eight sacks led the NFL outright, and one hundred forty-nine quarterback hits also ranked first — the hundredth percentile. Third-down stop rate sat at the ninety-seventh percentile. Quarterbacks did not breathe in this defense. The one nit: only sixteen takeaways on the year, twenty-fourth in football, twenty-eighth percentile — the pressure didn't always convert into the ball. But when it did, it was a haymaker. Week 8 against Dallas, fourth quarter, Denver already up twenty, Dak Prescott trying to climb back from the eleven-yard line — Dre'mont Tillman picked it off in the red zone and ran it thirty-six yards. That one play was worth more than seven full expected points on its own and it captured the defense's whole identity: relentless front, opportunistic when the rush met the route.
And the run defense. Quieter story, still good. Denver allowed ninety-one point two rushing yards a game and a rushing expected points added allowed of minus seventeen, sixty-third percentile — above average, not elite, and steady week to week. Opponents averaged below the league norm per carry, and no single game blew up on them on the ground. The interior held up week after week — which is how you survive a year with only sixteen takeaways. You don't let the run put offenses in easy down and distance. Solid, dependable, and a perfect complement to the league-leading pass rush in front of it.
Draft RecapMay 11, 2026Broncos — 2026 Draft Recap
7 picks in the 2026 NFL Draft
▾
Broncos — 2026 Draft Recap
7 picks in the 2026 NFL Draft
Show notes & transcript
Welcome back to Muffed. The Broncos walked into the 2026 draft without a first-round pick — that chip got cashed in earlier — so Denver's class has no top-32 headliner to anchor it. Instead, George Paton and Sean Payton played the middle and back of the board, seven picks total, shaped around two ideas: get younger on both lines, add explosion to the passing game. The on-paper headliner is a third-round defensive tackle out of Texas A&M, but the soul of this haul is the two fourth-rounders Paton flat-out said would define the class.
Start with run defense — Denver's highest pick lives here. At sixty-six overall, the Broncos took Tyler Onyedim, a twenty-three-year-old defensive tackle from Texas A&M. The college line is workmanlike — forty-eight tackles, nine for loss, three sacks — but the traits are what made him a third-rounder. Onyedim posted a Relative Athletic Score of 8.31, and quick definition: Relative Athletic Score is a zero-to-ten grade benchmarking combine and pro-day testing against every player at his position since 1987. That 8.31 lands him in the top fifteen percent of defensive tackles ever measured. And here's the thing — Denver's 2025 run defense was already fine, minus seventeen rushing expected points added on the season, which is a positive result for a defense. So Onyedim isn't a bandage. He's the youth infusion Paton openly wanted up front. Late in the seventh at two-fifty-seven, Denver added Buffalo linebacker Red Murdock as the forced-fumble dart throw — Payton's most enthusiastic line of the presser was, quote, he may hold the record for forced fumbles, end quote. The 6.81 athletic score says average traits, real motor.
Denver's 2025 rushing offense was neutral — roughly zero rushing expected points added, eighteen scores on the ground — so the one pick spent here had to be an efficiency injection, not a desperation hire. At one-oh-eight, it was Jonah Coleman, running back, Washington, and the first of the two fourth-rounders Paton said would define the class. One hundred fifty-six carries, seven hundred fifty-eight yards, fifteen rushing touchdowns — second in the Big Ten, twenty-third nationally — plus thirty-one catches for three hundred fifty-four yards. The number that pops: plus zero point three three predicted points added per play — the college version of NFL expected points added — and plus fifty-seven on the season. Elite efficiency in round four. Payton specifically called out the pass-protection frame and third-down viability — physical, smart, tough, and the protection traits don't need to be projected the way they usually do with college backs.
The offensive line got the other defining fourth-rounder, three picks later at one-eleven: Kage Casey, tackle out of Boise State with guard-tackle versatility. The Relative Athletic Score is 6.85 grading him as a guard — sixtieth-percentile range — and Paton was explicit that the swing-tackle, swing-guard flex is what made Casey the pick over a third running back. Denver's 2025 pass protection allowed twenty-three sacks across seventeen games, which is genuinely good. Casey isn't a panic move. He's the youth-on-the-line piece Paton kept circling back to.
Denver's 2025 passing offense produced plus fifty-three expected points added at plus zero point zero eight per dropback — fine, not explosive — and Paton said the word explosion specifically when describing what this draft was supposed to add. Two tight ends, two different jobs. In round five at one-fifty-two, Denver took Justin Joly, a twenty-two-year-old tight end from North Carolina State whose seven receiving touchdowns ranked second in his conference. Payton put him in the F-tight-end bucket — the move piece, the flex. Then with the very last pick of the draft, two-fifty-six, Mr. Irrelevant himself: Dallen Bentley out of Utah. Forty-eight catches, six hundred twenty yards, six touchdowns, plus zero point three five predicted points added per play for a total of plus twenty-four in the Big 12. Serious production for the final pick of the entire draft. And Bentley smashed his testing — 9.40 Relative Athletic Score, top six percent of tight ends ever tested. Payton categorized him as the inline Y, the bigger body who works down the field.
Pass defense got one swing at two-forty-six: Miles Scott, safety, Illinois. Sixty-four tackles, four pass breakups, a 7.87 Relative Athletic Score — top fifteen percent for free safeties. Payton said Scott's a converted receiver with seven career interceptions and natural ball skills, and he came recommended by Denver players who were his teammates at Illinois.
Pick of the draft has to be Jonah Coleman, and the argument is scarcity of trait. You could make the case for Onyedim on round value, or Bentley on the testing-versus-slot gap. But Coleman is the only player in this class who pairs top-of-conference touchdown production with elite efficiency and the pass-protection frame that keeps him on the field on third down. Three-down backs in round four are rare. Payton said openly that most college backs need third-down protection projection — Coleman doesn't. That's the pick that bends Denver's offense.
Looking to 2026, the real question isn't whether the headline picks hit — it's whether seven picks and no first-rounder is enough to move the depth chart on a team that already paid its way into Waddle and is leaning on returning starters. Paton said it himself: younger on both lines, more offensive explosion. On those two narrow goals, the haul lines up. The stress test is whether a class built on day-two-and-three swings delivers real snaps when the lights come on.
Prefer your fantasy roster?
Build a free show around your guys — no signup. Press play and hear every one of them, right now.
