Rhamondre Stevenson

Rhamondre Stevenson finished as a top-twenty-five back last season on the strength of nine touchdowns — and almost everything about that line points down for 2026. The Muffed 2026 preview on a quiet fade.

The 2025 season looked fine on the surface: a hundred thirty carries for six hundred three yards, seven rushing scores, thirty-two catches — eleven-six a game, RB21 per game. The signature was a three-touchdown, thirty-five point explosion against Miami in Week 18. But the shape is the warning: it was a part-time carry count propped up by an unusually high touchdown rate, and he gave way late as the rookie behind him took over.

The arc is unremarkable: a twelve-six-a-game peak back in 2022, then a pair of ten-six seasons, and eleven-six. Solid, replaceable RB2 production, with the value increasingly tied to scoring rather than volume.

Here's the call, and two of our patterns fire on it together. First, his touchdown share is thirty percent — just into the top quartile, where backs that touchdown-dependent fade about three points a game the next season. Seven rushing scores on a hundred thirty carries is a rate that regresses. Second, he's a career-year-five back, the band where our aging rule docks production further. Stack a touchdown fade on an aging curve and the eleven-six comes down toward RB3 territory.

And the situation, per the reports, removes the cushion — though the story is messier than a straight line: New England's backfield is a true 1A-and-1B with TreVeyon Henderson, and the rookie's season actually arced — he seized the lead job around late October, then faded down the stretch, and Stevenson had retaken the number-one role before the playoffs, leading the backfield touches on the run to the AFC title. So Stevenson isn't fading quietly — he holds the early-down and goal-line work on merit. But the efficiency gap is real, Henderson out-carried him across the full season, and the smart money is still on the split tilting younger. He's unlikely to hold the volume that made him an RB21.

The price: pick seventy-six, the twenty-eighth back. Verdict: LEAN — overpriced. The finish was touchdown-fueled, the back is aging in profile if not in years, and the rookie behind him is better per touch — three reasons the RB21 production doesn't repeat, at a price that needs it to. The counter for him: he led the playoff touches, holds the goal-line work, and is only twenty-seven, so he's not going away. But you're paying RB28 for the half of a committee the team is incentivized to shrink.

September watch: the carry split with Henderson — the whole bet; and the touchdown rate, where seven scores is the part most likely to fall. Your whole roster gets this treatment every week — that's the show.