Quarterback-Fault Sack Rate
Quarterback-Fault Sack Rate — 2022 NFL rankings, updated Aug 13, 2026. Justin Fields (CHI) took more sacks of his own making than any other quarterback, on 8.8% of his dropbacks across 31 qualifying players. Based on verified 2022 play-by-play data (nflverse); Half-PPR scoring. Through the 2022 season.
Not every sack belongs to the offensive line. Charters mark the ones where the quarterback held the ball past the play's expiry, drifted up into pressure that was going to miss him, or missed an open receiver with time to throw. As a share of dropbacks that is the portion of a team's sack total the passer carries himself, and it is the reason two quarterbacks behind identical protection can post sack numbers that look nothing alike.
| # | Player | Own Sk% | Own Sk | DB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Justin Fields | 8.8% | 33 | 373 |
| 2 | Carson Wentz | 6.9% | 21 | 304 |
| 3 | Russell Wilson | 6.9% | 37 | 537 |
| 4 | Daniel Jones | 6.7% | 34 | 511 |
| 5 | Marcus Mariota | 6.2% | 20 | 324 |
| 6 | Matthew Stafford | 6.0% | 20 | 332 |
| 7 | Baker Mayfield | 5.7% | 21 | 370 |
| 8 | Mac Jones | 5.1% | 24 | 474 |
| 9 | Jalen Hurts | 5.0% | 25 | 499 |
| 10 | Jimmy Garoppolo | 4.6% | 15 | 326 |
| 11 | Aaron Rodgers | 4.5% | 26 | 573 |
| 12 | Ryan Tannehill | 4.5% | 16 | 358 |
| 13 | Matt Ryan | 4.4% | 22 | 498 |
| 14 | Andy Dalton | 4.2% | 17 | 403 |
| 15 | Geno Smith | 4.1% | 25 | 617 |
| 16 | Jacoby Brissett | 4.1% | 16 | 390 |
| 17 | Kyler Murray | 4.1% | 17 | 416 |
| 18 | Kenny Pickett | 3.9% | 16 | 415 |
| 19 | Kirk Cousins | 3.9% | 27 | 689 |
| 20 | Joe Burrow | 3.7% | 24 | 647 |
| 21 | Davis Mills | 3.5% | 18 | 509 |
| 22 | Josh Allen | 3.5% | 21 | 599 |
| 23 | Derek Carr | 3.4% | 18 | 531 |
| 24 | Tua Tagovailoa | 3.1% | 13 | 420 |
| 25 | Trevor Lawrence | 3.0% | 18 | 610 |
| 26 | Justin Herbert | 2.9% | 21 | 735 |
| 27 | Lamar Jackson | 2.8% | 10 | 351 |
| 28 | Patrick Mahomes | 2.7% | 18 | 674 |
| 29 | Jared Goff | 2.5% | 15 | 609 |
| 30 | Tom Brady | 2.1% | 16 | 754 |
| 31 | Dak Prescott | 1.7% | 7 | 414 |
Other seasons
Choosing between two of these players?
Both men's 2025 production side by side, and which of them rests on inputs that historically repeat.
More leaderboards
- Rushing Yards Over Expected
- Target Share
- Running Back Receiving Efficiency
- Completion Percentage Over Expected
- Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt
- Quarterback Pressure Rate
- Defensive Blitz Rate
- Quarterbacks vs Man and Zone Coverage
- Pass Rate Over Expected
- Clean-Core Rating
- Usage vs Production
- Team Expected Points Added
- Quarterback EPA per Dropback
- Air Yards Share
- Stacked Box Rate
- Regression Flags
- Weighted Opportunity Rating
- Snap Share
- Pass-Snap Share
- Receiving Yards per Pass Snap
- Availability
- Tight End Receiving Efficiency
- Tight End Average Depth of Target
- Stat Stickiness
- Play-Action Rate
- Pre-Snap Motion Rate
- Drop Rate
- Contested Catch Rate
- Interception-Worthy Throw Rate
- Quarterback Intended Air Yards
- Team Air Yards and Passing Volume
- Receiver Separation and Cushion
- Wide Receiver Receiving Efficiency
- Team Success Rate and Explosive Play Rate
- Goal-Line Usage
- Quarterback Deep Ball
- Team Pace
The weekly insights email. One story a week about what actually happened in the NFL — every number verified.
Get the story behind the numbers
The same AI that built these tables reads every play of every game and tells you what actually happened — as pages you can read and shows you can listen to, from this same verified data.
Drafting this month? Follow the guys you end up with, and your first weekly email lands Week 1 — the real plays and the real numbers behind everyone on your list.
Follow your guys — free →Ask this data a question
Every figure on this page comes out of Muffed's verified panel — and you can query the whole thing in plain English. No account, no key. Ask the data →
Use Muffed in your AI
Ask Claude or ChatGPT football questions and get these verified figures back, with sources. Add https://muffed.ai/api/mcp — free, no account, no API key.