Team Success Rate and Explosive Play Rate Leaders
Team Success Rate and Explosive Play Rate — 2025 NFL leaders, updated Sep 17, 2026. Los Angeles Rams led the league in success rate at 51.8%, ahead of 31 other qualifying teams. Based on verified 2025 play-by-play data (nflverse); Half-PPR scoring. Through the 2025 season.
These are the two halves of moving the ball, and a team can be excellent at one and poor at the other. Success rate counts the share of snaps that gained positive expected points — staying on schedule, second and four instead of second and nine — with no extra credit for how far the play went. Explosive rate counts the share that went 20 yards or more. An offense high in success and low in explosives grinds and rarely scores from distance; the reverse is the boom-bust offense that punts a lot and then scores from the far 40. Both columns appear twice, because a defense is measured on the same two questions with the signs reversed: the best defenses here are the ones lowest in both.
| # | Team | Off Succ% | Off Expl% | Def Succ% | Def Expl% | Off Plays | Listen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles Rams | 51.8% | 8.0% | 42.0% | 5.6% | 1,056 | |
| 2 | New England Patriots | 48.5% | 8.4% | 44.6% | 5.3% | 1,017 | |
| 3 | Buffalo Bills | 48.5% | 7.2% | 42.4% | 5.4% | 1,065 | |
| 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 48.3% | 5.2% | 48.5% | 5.4% | 1,065 | |
| 5 | Green Bay Packers | 47.7% | 6.4% | 44.8% | 4.6% | 993 | |
| 6 | Dallas Cowboys | 46.6% | 6.2% | 48.9% | 7.0% | 1,104 | |
| 7 | Seattle Seahawks | 46.3% | 7.5% | 39.7% | 4.6% | 997 | |
| 8 | Indianapolis Colts | 46.3% | 5.3% | 45.5% | 5.8% | 1,011 | |
| 9 | Chicago Bears | 45.8% | 6.5% | 46.7% | 7.2% | 1,096 | |
| 10 | Washington Commanders | 45.7% | 5.2% | 47.6% | 5.9% | 979 | |
| 11 | Cincinnati Bengals | 45.5% | 5.2% | 47.8% | 7.6% | 1,049 | |
| 12 | Detroit Lions | 45.3% | 7.6% | 41.7% | 6.5% | 1,051 | |
| 13 | Baltimore Ravens | 44.6% | 7.1% | 44.2% | 7.1% | 956 | |
| 14 | Kansas City Chiefs | 44.5% | 5.2% | 43.7% | 5.1% | 1,048 | |
| 15 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 44.4% | 6.1% | 41.3% | 5.0% | 1,074 | |
| 16 | Denver Broncos | 44.2% | 5.4% | 36.7% | 4.4% | 1,079 | |
| 17 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 44.0% | 5.3% | 43.3% | 5.5% | 975 | |
| 18 | Atlanta Falcons | 43.7% | 5.4% | 44.6% | 6.1% | 1,036 | |
| 19 | Los Angeles Chargers | 43.1% | 5.5% | 41.4% | 4.6% | 1,080 | |
| 20 | Carolina Panthers | 43.1% | 5.2% | 44.3% | 5.5% | 996 | |
| 21 | Philadelphia Eagles | 43.1% | 5.1% | 41.7% | 5.1% | 995 | |
| 22 | Arizona Cardinals | 43.0% | 5.3% | 48.5% | 6.4% | 1,074 | |
| 23 | Minnesota Vikings | 42.6% | 4.9% | 41.0% | 3.7% | 943 | |
| 24 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 42.3% | 6.0% | 44.8% | 6.7% | 1,065 | |
| 25 | New York Giants | 42.1% | 5.7% | 47.0% | 6.6% | 1,079 | |
| 26 | New Orleans Saints | 42.0% | 3.6% | 41.8% | 5.3% | 1,064 | |
| 27 | Miami Dolphins | 41.9% | 6.3% | 48.5% | 6.5% | 942 | |
| 28 | Houston Texans | 41.3% | 5.2% | 38.3% | 5.6% | 1,078 | |
| 29 | New York Jets | 40.7% | 3.9% | 45.6% | 6.8% | 1,009 | |
| 30 | Las Vegas Raiders | 37.6% | 4.5% | 45.0% | 4.4% | 942 | |
| 31 | Tennessee Titans | 37.4% | 5.1% | 45.2% | 6.7% | 995 | |
| 32 | Cleveland Browns | 34.5% | 4.0% | 40.2% | 5.7% | 1,028 |
Other seasons
More leaderboards
- Rushing Yards Over Expected
- Target Share
- Running Back Receiving Efficiency
- Completion Percentage Over Expected
- Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt
- Quarterback Pressure Rate
- Defensive Blitz Rate
- Quarterbacks vs Man and Zone Coverage
- Pass Rate Over Expected
- Clean-Core Rating
- Usage vs Production
- Team Expected Points Added
- Quarterback EPA per Dropback
- QB Composite Rating
- Air Yards Share
- Stacked Box Rate
- Regression Flags
- Weighted Opportunity Rating
- Snap Share
- Pass-Snap Share
- Receiving Yards per Pass Snap
- Availability
- Tight End Receiving Efficiency
- Tight End Average Depth of Target
- Stat Stickiness
- Play-Action Rate
- Pre-Snap Motion Rate
- Drop Rate
- Contested Catch Rate
- Interception-Worthy Throw Rate
- Quarterback-Fault Sack Rate
- Quarterback Intended Air Yards
- Team Air Yards and Passing Volume
- Receiver Separation and Cushion
- Wide Receiver Receiving Efficiency
- Goal-Line Usage
- Quarterback Deep Ball
- Team Pace
Follow the football you care about. Players, teams, stat boards — press Follow on any of them, and that is what your weekly email is made of. Nothing you didn't ask for.
Use Muffed in your AI
Ask Claude or ChatGPT football questions and get these verified figures back, with sources. Add https://muffed.ai/api/mcp — free, no account, no API key.