No-Huddle Rate Leaders
No-Huddle Rate — 2026 NFL leaders, updated Oct 2, 2026. Philadelphia Eagles led the league in no-huddle rate at 16.5%, ahead of 31 other qualifying teams. Based on verified nflverse play-by-play data, regular season only. Through Week 3 of the 2026 season.
No-huddle rate is the share of an offense's scrimmage snaps run without a huddle first, from the no-huddle flag in nflverse play-by-play — the same figure as the No-Huddle column on the team pace board. Rank 1 is the offense that huddles least, which is a tempo choice rather than a grade, and skipping the huddle is not the same as playing fast: a team can line up early and still let the play clock run. In season every figure here is season to date, and before Week 4 it rests on two or three games — a gap of a few points between neighbours is noise until the sample grows.
| # | Team | Δ WK | G | No-Huddle | Neutral Sec/Play | Plays/G | Snaps | Listen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Philadelphia Eagles | No change | 3 | 16.5% | 32.22 | 56.7 | 170 | |
| 2 | New Orleans Saints | No change | 3 | 16.2% | 26.92 | 74.0 | 222 | |
| 3 | Tennessee Titans | No change | 3 | 14.0% | 29.66 | 52.3 | 157 | |
| 4 | Green Bay Packers | No change | 3 | 11.1% | 25.72 | 60.0 | 180 | |
| 5 | Pittsburgh Steelers | Up 1 place, from 6 | 3 | 10.3% | 29.24 | 61.3 | 184 | |
| 6 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | Up 1 place, from 7 | 3 | 10.2% | 28.92 | 59.0 | 177 | |
| 7 | Arizona Cardinals | Up 9 places, from 16 | 3 | 8.7% | 28.77 | 65.3 | 196 | |
| 8 | Los Angeles Rams | Up 3 places, from 11 | 3 | 8.3% | 28.72 | 64.0 | 192 | |
| 9 | Washington Commanders | Down 1 place, from 8 | 3 | 8.1% | 27.78 | 66.0 | 198 | |
| 10 | Houston Texans | Down 5 places, from 5 | 3 | 8.0% | 28.10 | 66.7 | 200 | |
| 11 | Jacksonville Jaguars | Down 2 places, from 9 | 3 | 7.2% | 30.80 | 55.7 | 167 | |
| 12 | Denver Broncos | Down 2 places, from 10 | 3 | 6.1% | 29.13 | 54.7 | 164 | |
| 13 | Minnesota Vikings | Up 10 places, from 23 | 3 | 5.5% | 30.42 | 55.0 | 165 | |
| 14 | New York Jets | Up 8 places, from 22 | 3 | 5.2% | 32.68 | 64.7 | 194 | |
| 15 | Carolina Panthers | Down 2 places, from 13 | 3 | 5.1% | 25.08 | 65.0 | 195 | |
| 16 | Dallas Cowboys | Up 3 places, from 19 | 3 | 5.1% | 29.23 | 59.3 | 178 | |
| 17 | Los Angeles Chargers | Up 3 places, from 20 | 3 | 4.5% | 28.88 | 59.0 | 177 | |
| 18 | New York Giants | Down 6 places, from 12 | 3 | 4.5% | 29.67 | 59.0 | 177 | |
| 19 | Cincinnati Bengals | Up 5 places, from 24 | 3 | 4.5% | 28.94 | 58.7 | 176 | |
| 20 | Indianapolis Colts | Down 6 places, from 14 | 3 | 4.3% | 30.37 | 62.3 | 187 | |
| 21 | Baltimore Ravens | Down 4 places, from 17 | 3 | 4.0% | 30.39 | 57.7 | 173 | |
| 22 | Chicago Bears | Down 7 places, from 15 | 3 | 3.9% | 29.36 | 68.7 | 206 | |
| 23 | Buffalo Bills | Up 4 places, from 27 | 3 | 3.9% | 28.60 | 60.0 | 180 | |
| 24 | Las Vegas Raiders | Up 2 places, from 26 | 3 | 3.3% | 29.89 | 61.3 | 184 | |
| 25 | Atlanta Falcons | Down 7 places, from 18 | 3 | 3.2% | 31.94 | 63.0 | 189 | |
| 26 | Detroit Lions | Down 1 place, from 25 | 3 | 3.0% | 31.53 | 65.7 | 197 | |
| 27 | Cleveland Browns | Down 6 places, from 21 | 3 | 2.4% | 27.67 | 54.7 | 164 | |
| 28 | Seattle Seahawks | No change | 3 | 1.7% | 31.42 | 59.3 | 178 | |
| 29 | Miami Dolphins | Up 1 place, from 30 | 3 | 1.7% | 29.63 | 57.7 | 173 | |
| 30 | New England Patriots | Up 2 places, from 32 | 3 | 1.1% | 30.49 | 59.3 | 178 | |
| 31 | San Francisco 49ers | Down 2 places, from 29 | 3 | 0.6% | 32.00 | 53.3 | 160 | |
| 32 | Kansas City Chiefs | Down 1 place, from 31 | 3 | 0.5% | 29.31 | 63.7 | 191 |
Other seasons
More leaderboards
- Rushing Yards Over Expected
- Target Share
- Running Back Receiving Efficiency
- Completion Percentage Over Expected
- Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt
- Quarterback Pressure Rate
- Defensive Blitz Rate
- Quarterbacks vs Man and Zone Coverage
- Pass Rate Over Expected
- Clean-Core Rating
- Usage vs Production
- Team Expected Points Added
- Quarterback EPA per Dropback
- QB Composite Rating
- Air Yards Share
- Stacked Box Rate
- Regression Flags
- Weighted Opportunity Rating
- Snap Share
- Pass-Snap Share
- Receiving Yards per Pass Snap
- Availability
- Tight End Receiving Efficiency
- Tight End Average Depth of Target
- Stat Stickiness
- Play-Action Rate
- Pre-Snap Motion Rate
- Drop Rate
- Contested Catch Rate
- Interception-Worthy Throw Rate
- Quarterback-Fault Sack Rate
- Quarterback Intended Air Yards
- Team Air Yards and Passing Volume
- Receiver Separation and Cushion
- Wide Receiver Receiving Efficiency
- Team Success Rate and Explosive Play Rate
- Goal-Line Usage
- Quarterback Deep Ball
- Team Pace
- Screen Pass Rate
- RPO Rate
- Light Box Rate
- Quarterbacks vs the Blitz
- Throwaway Rate
- Catchable Throw Rate
- Out-of-Pocket Rate
- Time to Throw
- Aggressiveness
Follow No-Huddle Rate. When this board moves, you'll know — what changed, week over week.
Use Muffed in your AI
Ask Claude or ChatGPT football questions and get these verified figures back, with sources. Add https://muffed.ai/api/mcp — free, no account, no API key.